by admin | Mar 21, 2024 | Neuropathy, Mesenchymal Stem Cells, Stem Cell Research, Stem Cell Therapy
Neuropathic pain is pain caused as part of a dysfunction in the nervous system, including the peripheral nerves, brain, and spinal cord. Often characterized by spontaneous pain occurring for no specific reason, neuropathic pain can range from mild to severe and is currently estimated to affect 150 million people in the United States. The risk of experiencing neuropathic pain is also much higher in those with preexisting medical conditions, especially diabetes.
Treating neuropathic pain has proven to be very challenging and, to date, most current medical treatments are designed to mitigate pain while not addressing the underlying cause of the pain.
Spinal reorganization and changes in the excitatory or inhibitory pathways controlling neuropathic pain development following peripheral nerve injury are correlated with altered gene expression. Considering this, Siniscalco, Rossi, and Maione review newer molecular methods, including gene therapy and delivery of biologic anti-nociceptive molecules, as potential therapeutic approaches for the treatment of neuropathic pain.
The authors also review the use of stem cell therapy as the potential to slow the progression of or even altogether block neuropathic pain. Stem cells have the ability to incorporate into the spinal cord, differentiate, and to improve locomotion recovery. Furthermore, and despite associated ethical concerns, human stem cells have demonstrated the ability to migrate to the injured area of the spinal cord and differentiate in order to promote axon regeneration and synapse regeneration as a way to alleviate neuropathic pain and improve motor behavior.
Further exploring stem cell therapy as a potential treatment for neuropathic pain, Siniscalco et al. point out that using genetically engineered stem cells expressing trophic factors appears to be a useful tool in relieving neuropathic pain. The authors hypothesize that the benefit brought by stem cells could be a result of their ability to deliver anti-nociceptive molecules close to the pain processing centers or site of injury and that the trophic factors provided by stem cells could, themselves, act as an anti-nociceptive drug.
Of the many various types of stem cells, the authors believe that mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) demonstrate the potential for the best results in pain-care research. Found throughout the body, MSCs demonstrate a high expansion potential, genetic stability, and stable phenotype, and are easily collected and transported.
In addition, MSCs also are able to migrate to sites of tissue injury and demonstrate strong immunosuppressive properties and are able to differentiate into neurons and astrocytes. Animal models of neurological disorders have demonstrated that MSCs are able to improve neurological deficits and to promote neuronal network improvements.
Although the underlying mechanisms of how MSCs specifically address pain behavior are yet to be fully understood, their ability to migrate to injured tissue and mediate functional recovery suggests that MSCs could modulate pain generation after a neuropathic injury.
The authors conclude that neuropathic pain is a very complex disease that is very difficult to treat. While current treatment is designed to address the symptoms of pain, a treatment for the cause has yet to be developed. There are new molecular methods, including antisense strategy, gene therapy, and virus therapy currently being evaluated as potential therapeutic options to treat the underlying causes of pain.
Most recently, preliminary clinical evidence suggests that stem cell therapy could be the most effective long-term treatment for definitive relief of pain caused by neuropathic injury or disease.
Source: “Stem cell therapy for neuropathic pain treatment – PMC – NCBI.” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3908122/.
by admin | Mar 14, 2024 | Spinal Cord Injury, Mesenchymal Stem Cells, Stem Cell Research, Stem Cell Therapy
Nerve damage resulting from spinal cord injury (SCI) often leads to temporary or permanent loss of function and contributes to poor quality of life. Most common among males below 30 years of age, SCI recovery has been limited specifically as a result of the low growth capacity of neurons and a lack of nerve growth factors.
While current SCI treatment focuses on stabilizing the injured area and preventing secondary injury through a combination of surgery, pharmacological intervention, and rehabilitation, the success of treatment has been limited and unable to stimulate spinal cord regeneration.
Considering the limited success of confidential SCI treatments, several types of stem cells are currently being tested for the treatment of SCI, including mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) isolated from bone marrow (BMSCs), umbilical cord (UC-MSCs), and adipose tissue (ADSCs).
In this review, Liau et al. discuss the current status of MSC therapy for SCI, criteria to consider when applying MSC therapy, and review novel biological therapies that can be used together with MSC therapy to enhance its therapeutic potential.
Based on the results of clinical trials, the authors conclude that MSC therapy is beneficial for SCI patients. While not all patients responded to MSC therapy, the authors note that observed improvement varied from patient to patient. In addition to discrepancies attributed to patient variations, source of MSC, route of stem cell administration, timing of cell administration, number of cell administrations, number of cells administered, and cell preparation methods were also observed to affect the efficacy of therapy.
Despite the delayed progress in phase III trials, there are several new therapeutic treatment strategies that incorporate stem cell secretory product-based therapy, including stem cell secretome therapy, scaffold-based therapy, and immunotherapy. The authors indicate that all of these novel therapeutic approaches may be able to be used in combination with MSC therapy to enhance the therapeutic efficacy of MSCs by improving cell survival, migration, engraftment, and proliferation.
The authors conclude this review by summarizing that, to date, MSC therapy has been demonstrated to be safe but unable to improve neurological function for all treated patients. Despite the limited success of this therapy, other studies are currently underway in an effort to improve the delivery of MSCs and MSC-derived products by utilizing scaffolds or by combining them with immunotherapy to improve the efficacy of the treatment.
Source: “Treatment of spinal cord injury with mesenchymal stem cells – NCBI.” 22 Sep. 2020, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7510077/.
by admin | Mar 7, 2024 | Spinal Cord Injury, Mesenchymal Stem Cells, Stem Cell Research, Stem Cell Therapy
Spinal cord injuries (SCI) are the most serious complication associated with spinal injuries and often result in permanent damage to the nervous system. With nearly 300,000 people in the United States living with SCI, the inability to treat these injuries has a significant impact on physical, mental, and financial health.
Additionally, while 94% of those suffering acute traumatic SCI survive initial treatment for the condition, both long-term survival and quality of life are often reduced as a result of post-injury complications. Further complicating the issue is the fact that the current standard of SCI treatment is designed only to reduce the secondary effects of injury and not directly promote healing through neuroregeneration.
Considering that mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are known to have anti-inflammatory properties, promote vascular regeneration, and to release neuro-nutrients, they are becoming increasingly promising as a potential treatment for SCI.
In this article, Xia et al. examine the evidence of pathophysiological changes occurring after SCI, review the underlying mechanisms of MSCs, summarize the potential application of MSCs in clinical practice, and highlight the challenges surrounding the use of MSCs in the treatment of SCI in future applications.
The goal of any SCI therapeutic treatment option is to promote rapid recovery of neurological function through a combination of medical and surgical interventions. However, to date, there are no optimal treatment strategies that allow for this goal to be met.
MSCs’ multidirectional differentiation capabilities are highly viable and known to provide structural support in SCI. In terms of using MSCs in the treatment of SCI, and specifically for their role as an anti-inflammatory agent, the most attractive aspect is their unique immunomodulatory ability.
Additionally, the goal of treatment after SCI is to repair the damaged nerve cells and restore nerve function. Studies exploring differentiation of MSCs after SCI have demonstrated spontaneously expressed neuromarkers at SCI sites and have allowed for recovery of neurological function.
The authors point out that traumatic SCI usually results in the direct destruction of blood vessels around the spinal cord which often results in ischemic necrosis and secondary injuries. Since promoting vascular recovery contributes to the recovery of motor function in patients with SCI, SCI vascular recovery is a new target for the treatment of SCI. Several studies have observed that MSCs secrete angiogenic factors that promote pericyte recruitment, a critical step in vascular maturation. The authors also report recent findings indicating that 57% of the vascular endothelial cells around the SCI of a mouse showed vascular regeneration effects after receiving MSC-EVs with an extensive vascular network formed around the injury over a period of 28 days.
Although MSCs are beneficial to the recovery of neurological function in patients with SCI, the authors call for additional research to focus on better understanding the SCI cellular mechanisms and MSC action for use in clinical practice. Additionally, Xia et al. point out that the survival rate and long-term survival of MSCs in the SCI microenvironment remain an unresolved issue.
MSCs repair SCI through anti-inflammatory effects and by promoting nerve axon regeneration and vascular regeneration. While further research is required to fully understand the mechanism underlying the effect of MSCs, the authors conclude the role of MSCs in treating SCI has been demonstrated in several clinical trials.
Source: “Mesenchymal stem cells in the treatment of spinal cord injury.”
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1141601/full.
by admin | Feb 29, 2024 | Psoriasis, Mesenchymal Stem Cells, Stem Cell Research, Stem Cell Therapy
Chronic skin inflammatory diseases, including atopic dermatitis (AD) and psoriasis, are considered uncontrolled responses to systemic inflammation.
Characterized by swelling, irritation, and rash chronic skin inflammatory disease, these common skin inflammatory diseases are estimated to affect 25% of the population, with AD and psoriasis being the most common form of the disease.
Recent methods used to treat AD and psoriasis have been based on inhibition, not regulation, of the condition. Over time, these methods of treatment can result in a number of side effects and drug resistance.
Considering that mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been used to treat a number of immune diseases, Yang et al. believe they present as a promising treatment for chronic skin inflammatory disease. As part of this review, the authors discuss the therapeutic effects of MSCs on AD and psoriasis, provide clinical evaluation of the administration of MSCs, and present a comprehensive vision for the application of MSCs in future research and treatment.
AD and psoriasis are known to be systemic and immune-allergic inflammatory skin diseases caused primarily by the imbalance between pro- and anti-inflammatory factors. MSCs play a role in regeneration and immunomodulation and their function in skin lesions present in these conditions could provide important information about their biological function in the diseases.
Considering that inflammation related to both AD and psoriasis begins at the MSC level, a treatment designed to address abnormal MSCs can potentially improve the pathogenesis of these diseases. While this method appears promising, the authors point out that the therapeutic methods designed to treat lesions associated with MSCs have yet to be determined and treating skin inflammatory disease with these improved MSCs requires further clinical study.
The authors also highlight the potential benefit of preconditioning MCSs as a way to improve the immune regulation capacity in treating a range of immune diseases. Specifically, precondition MSCs have been shown to alleviate allergic inflammation in keratinocytes and reduce inflammation in the skin through the JAK-STAT pathway.
While the benefits associated with preconditioning MSCs for this purpose require further research, Yang et al. believe that preconditioning MSCs with inflammatory factors can more effectively treat skin inflammatory diseases.
In addition to showing the benefits of MSC therapy when treating AD and psoriasis, the authors of this review also point out some limitations associated with the application of MSCs. These limitations include the need for double-blind placebo-controlled studies to indicate the potential clinical application of MSCs in AD and psoriasis and issues with the production and cost of MSCs not being able to reach the standard (making it difficult to translate into clinical treatment).
Despite these limitations, the application of MSCs has shown to be more effective in treating AD and psoriasis than other options that are currently available.
Yang et al. conclude that the advancing technology for administering MSCs and their capability of regeneration, immunomodulation, and differentiation have made them a promising strategy for the treatment of skin inflammatory diseases. The authors also call for additional studies to further uncover the mechanisms of the therapeutic effects of MSCs in AD and psoriasis to help better define therapeutic strategies for treating these diseases.
Source: Yang J, Xiao M, Ma K, Li H, Ran M, Yang S, Yang Y, Fu X and Yang S (2023) Therapeutic effects of mesenchymal stem cells and their derivatives in common skin inflammatory diseases: Atopic dermatitis and psoriasis. Front. Immunol. 14:1092668. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1092668
by admin | Feb 22, 2024 | Spinal Cord Injury, Adipose, Mesenchymal Stem Cells, Stem Cell Research, Stem Cell Therapy
With more than 17,000 people in the US sustaining a spinal cord injury (SCI) each year and an estimated combined cost to healthcare and the workforce exceeding $40 billion, the condition has significant personal and socioeconomic implications. In addition, SCIs have limited pharmacological treatment options to support the regeneration of nerve damage.
Considering the limited treatment options for this condition, the field of regenerative medicine, and specifically the use of stem cells, has recently drawn interest as a potential therapeutic treatment option for paralysis resulting from SCIs.
In this report, Bydon et al. summarize findings of the ongoing multidisciplinary phase 1 clinical trial exploring the safety and efficacy of intrathecal autologous adipose tissue-derived (AD) mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in patients with blunt, traumatic SCI.
Specifically, as part of this report, the authors describe the outcome of the first patient with C3-4 SCI treated with AD-MSCs. At the time of SCI, neurologic examination revealed complete loss of motor and sensory function below the level of injury; an injury diagnosed as an American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) grade A SCI.
After undergoing initial treatment, including C2-6 posterior cervical decompression and fusion, improvement in motor and sensory function was demonstrable. However, neurological gains plateaued 6 months after sustaining injury.
Upon enrollment into the CELLTOP clinical trial 9 months after injury, the patient’s neurologic status was found to be ASIA grade C and imaging revealed bilateral myelomalacia at the C3 level and at the C2-6 decompression and fusion. Additionally, an open biopsy of adipose tissue found in the abdominal wall was performed 8 weeks prior to receiving an initial intrathecal injection.
After receiving an intrathecal injection of 100 million autologous AD-MSCs 11 months after injury, the patient was observed for clinical signs of efficacy at 3, 6, 12, and 18 months following injection.
Bydon et al. observed progressive improvement in upper extremity motor scores and considerable improvement in lower extremity scores at 18 months following injection. The patient also demonstrated consistent improvement in ASIA sensory score, including improvements in pinprick and light touch scores at follow-up after 18 months. The authors reported patient improvements in Capabilities of Upper Extremity score, quality of life (as measured by Global Health Score), and in physical and occupational therapy measures. Other than a moderate headache on day 2, no other safety issues or adverse events were reported.
While further clinical trial is required, the authors conclude that intrathecal AD-MSC administration may be a relatively noninvasive and safe therapeutic option for patients with SCI to improve their neurologic status after reaching a ceiling effect in terms of spontaneous recovery.
Source: “First Report From a Phase 1 Trial of Autologous Adipose Tissue ….” 27 Nov. 2019, https://www.mayoclinicproceedings.org/article/S0025-6196(19)30871-7/fulltext.
St. Petersburg, Florida
